Skip to main content

Metric details

Every pilot's reading on every behaviour, family by family.

Analysis computed

best: could be chance (0.12)

best: clear pattern (0.66)

#PilotOut-climbCore sLeaveRateKept%TopOut%Round
1Kari Ellis71 (44 shared climbs)41 (22 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.6 (18 climbs ≥ 90 s)83 (20/24 circling bouts led to climbs)64 (mean on-course altitude 53% of band)0.19 (122 circles, 28% left)
2Wally Arcidiacono65 (53 shared climbs)38 (24 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.2 (15 climbs ≥ 90 s)90 (19/21 circling bouts led to climbs)53 (mean on-course altitude 51% of band)0.19 (180 circles, 41% left)
3Gareth Carter63 (44 shared climbs)37 (20 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (16 climbs ≥ 90 s)88 (23/26 circling bouts led to climbs)61 (mean on-course altitude 54% of band)0.19 (166 circles, 36% left)
4James Thompson70 (50 shared climbs)36 (17 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.6 (12 climbs ≥ 90 s)95 (19/20 circling bouts led to climbs)51 (mean on-course altitude 55% of band)0.21 (136 circles, 38% left)
5Brian Webb59 (32 shared climbs)67 (19 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.0 (17 climbs ≥ 90 s)89 (17/19 circling bouts led to climbs)68 (mean on-course altitude 60% of band)0.20 (176 circles, 60% left)
6Geoff Wong73 (35 shared climbs)49 (21 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (18 climbs ≥ 90 s)92 (22/24 circling bouts led to climbs)70 (mean on-course altitude 55% of band)0.20 (186 circles, 59% left)
7Jan Bennewitz76 (36 shared climbs)43 (23 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (11 climbs ≥ 90 s)95 (21/22 circling bouts led to climbs)74 (mean on-course altitude 73% of band)0.22 (142 circles, 71% left)
8Paul Kimber69 (35 shared climbs)40 (16 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (13 climbs ≥ 90 s)85 (17/20 circling bouts led to climbs)58 (mean on-course altitude 48% of band)0.20 (156 circles, 3% left)
9Zane Priebbenow72 (34 shared climbs)61 (17 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.3 (15 climbs ≥ 90 s)82 (18/22 circling bouts led to climbs)44 (mean on-course altitude 43% of band)0.17 (145 circles, 82% left)
11Rafael Esquillaro65 (40 shared climbs)41 (15 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.3 (8 climbs ≥ 90 s)83 (10/12 circling bouts led to climbs)45 (mean on-course altitude 53% of band)0.18 (143 circles, 42% left)
12Martin Joyce65 (48 shared climbs)36 (17 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.5 (12 climbs ≥ 90 s)78 (18/23 circling bouts led to climbs)54 (mean on-course altitude 55% of band)0.23 (149 circles, 10% left)
13Frank Adler67 (49 shared climbs)38 (19 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (13 climbs ≥ 90 s)72 (23/32 circling bouts led to climbs)37 (mean on-course altitude 40% of band)0.20 (182 circles, 60% left)
14Richard Binstead72 (18 shared climbs)41 (7 climbs ≥ 60 s)1.4 (5 climbs ≥ 90 s)43 (3/7 circling bouts led to climbs)61 (mean on-course altitude 48% of band)0.18 (82 circles, 21% left)

Share of lift turned in that was kept as a climb

Measured in percent · no expected direction

How selective the pilot is about the lift they stop for. Each period of circling of 30 s or more after the start counts as lift that the pilot sampled. If the period overlaps a detected thermal, the pilot kept that lift. If it does not, they turned a few circles and left it. The value is the percentage kept. A low value means they are selective. A high value means they keep almost every climb they turn in. There is no expected direction: selection wins on a strong day and wastes time on a weak one.

Acceptance by hour

HourMedian accepted (%)pilots
10013
8013
9112
258

Median per-pilot acceptance %, bucketed by the hour (competition time zone).

How round and consistent the circles were

Measured in ratio · no expected direction

Whether the pilot flies clean, repeatable circles, or moves around the thermal. We fit each detected circle by least squares. The RMS fit error divided by the fitted radius measures how round the turn was. The value is the median over all of the circles of the pilot. A lower value means smoother and more consistent turns. There is no expected direction: a rough trace can be a pilot chasing a drifting or broken core rather than a pilot circling badly.

Turn direction across the field: 44% left (1965 circles).

best: could be chance (0.31)

best: clear pattern (0.66)

best: clear pattern (0.74)

#PilotInGaggle%Marked%LeaveWin%
1Kari Ellis9847 (18/38 climbs marked)0 (0W–1L (1 departure))
2Wally Arcidiacono9136 (15/42 climbs marked)100 (1W–0L (1 departure))
3Gareth Carter9936 (13/36 climbs marked)100 (1W–0L (1 departure))
4James Thompson8462 (23/37 climbs marked)0 (0W–1L (1 departure))
5Brian Webb6541 (9/22 climbs marked)0 (0W–2L (2 departures))
6Geoff Wong6144 (14/32 climbs marked)50 (2W–2L (4 departures))
7Jan Bennewitz6450 (14/28 climbs marked)0 (0W–2L (2 departures))
8Paul Kimber5539 (15/38 climbs marked)67 (2W–1L (3 departures))
9Zane Priebbenow5335 (15/43 climbs marked)33 (1W–2L (3 departures))
11Rafael Esquillaro6270 (21/30 climbs marked)67 (2W–1L (3 departures))
12Martin Joyce4045 (21/47 climbs marked)0 (0W–1L (1 departure))
13Frank Adler3433 (17/51 climbs marked)0 (0W–2L (2 departures))
14Richard Binstead7567 (6/9 climbs marked)

Time spent flying with a gaggle

Measured in percent · no expected direction

Whether the pilot raced with other pilots or alone. The value is the share of their flying time after the start inside a detected gaggle, that is, clustered with one other racing pilot or more on the shared time grid. There is no expected direction. A gaggle increases the power to search for lift, but it also holds a pilot to its own speed. The sign of the correlation says which of the two occurred here.

27 gaggle episodes detected (peak size 13 pilots).

best: clear pattern (0.68)

#PilotStartDlyTimeLostBehindSpare m
1Kari Ellis77570.0-661
2Wally Arcidiacono1700.2-606
3Gareth Carter22480.3-563
4James Thompson914678.0-283
5Brian Webb583909.8-33
6Geoff Wong9564913.0-329
7Jan Bennewitz11463014.2-216
8Paul Kimber10068614.8-284
9Zane Priebbenow103126425.0-251
11Rafael Esquillaro50221
12Martin Joyce1081046
13Frank Adler1021052
14Richard Binstead1020

How long after the gate opened the pilot started

Measured in seconds · lower is better

Every second between the opening of the gate and the crossing of the start line is a second lost for nothing. The value is the seconds from the start gate taken to the scored SSS crossing. On an elapsed-time task, the pilot’s own crossing is the reference, so the delay is 0 by definition. The start table adds the crossing altitude, and the distance behind the leading pilot who had already started.

Start execution

PilotDelayAlt mBand %Behind km
Kari Ellis1:171602690.9
Wally Arcidiacono0:171666740.1
Gareth Carter0:221625700.2
James Thompson1:311527631.0
Brian Webb0:581581670.6
Geoff Wong1:351635711.0
Jan Bennewitz1:541676741.3
Paul Kimber1:401487601.1
Zane Priebbenow1:431494601.1
Rafael Esquillaro0:501581670.6
Martin Joyce1:481483591.2
Frank Adler1:421478591.1
Richard Binstead0:101611690.0

Delay = gate taken → SSS crossing. Behind km = extra distance to the next turnpoint vs the furthest-along already-started pilot at the moment of this start (time grid).

Race time lost against the fastest pilots, leg by leg

Measured in seconds · lower is better

For each completed speed-section leg, we compare the leg time of the pilot with the mean of the top 10 pilots by rank who completed that leg. Only the losses count, and we add them together. The sum of the leg times is the race time, and the rank defines the reference, so this metric follows the result by construction. Read the waterfall table, which shows every leg against the task winner, for the diagnosis. Do not read the correlation as a finding.

-0:13SSS→she050+1:39she050→mur046+1:50mur046→cud034-2:02cud034→ESS
Wally Arcidiacono, over 4 compared legs: +1:13 overall. — marks a leg the pilot or the winner did not complete; the table below has every pilot.

Leg waterfall — leg time vs the task winner

PilotSSS→she050she050→mur046mur046→cud034cud034→ESSTotal
Kari Ellis+0:00+0:00+0:00+0:00+0:00
Wally Arcidiacono-0:13+1:39+1:50-2:02+1:13
Gareth Carter+1:01-0:12+0:32-0:10+1:11
James Thompson+0:06+0:10+0:39+6:49+7:44
Brian Webb+2:11+8:04+2:03-2:09+10:08
Geoff Wong+0:10+5:10+14:24-6:59+12:45
Jan Bennewitz+6:50+4:39+0:20+1:48+13:37
Paul Kimber-1:16+2:04+17:26-3:48+14:26
Zane Priebbenow-1:04+0:44+27:03-2:06+24:38
Rafael Esquillaro+2:12+5:13-4:17+3:08
Martin Joyce+7:19+9:20+10:32+27:10
Frank Adler-0:07+18:28+7:49+26:10
Richard Binstead+1:20+1:20

Each cell is the leg time of this pilot minus the leg time of the winner. A + value is slower than the winner, and a − value is faster. A — means that the pilot or the winner did not complete the leg.

The scalar metric instead adds the losses against the mean of the top 10 pilots who completed each leg. A leg flown faster than that reference contributes 0.

Race time behind the leader at ESS

Measured in minutes · lower is better

At each speed-section turnpoint, we compare the elapsed race time of the pilot, which is the reaching time minus their own start, with the fastest pilot to that turnpoint. The value is the minutes behind at ESS. It follows the final rank almost exactly, because this metric is the sanity check of the evaluation.

A line that stops early is a pilot who landed. The top 5 are coloured; the table below has every pilot.

Horserace — minutes behind the leader at each turnpoint

Pilotell094she050mur046cud034ell030ell030
Kari Ellis1.11.20.10.00.05.8
Wally Arcidiacono0.10.00.52.20.20.0
Gareth Carter0.21.30.00.40.30.3
James Thompson1.31.60.61.18.05.4
Brian Webb0.83.110.012.09.87.0
Geoff Wong1.41.75.720.013.010.6
Jan Bennewitz1.78.712.212.414.212.2
Paul Kimber1.50.31.318.614.812.9
Zane Priebbenow1.50.60.227.125.022.4
Rafael Esquillaro0.73.07.12.7
Martin Joyce1.69.117.227.7
Frank Adler1.51.518.926.6
Richard Binstead0.01.4

The elapsed race time, from the pilot’s own start, minus the fastest elapsed time to that turnpoint. A — means that the pilot did not reach the turnpoint.

Arriving at ESS with height to spare

Measured in metres · lower is better

Height still available at ESS that the pilot no longer needed. That altitude was available for more speed, and the pilot did not use it. The value is the altitude at ESS minus the altitude needed to glide to goal at the standard glide ratio of the sport, which is 5.0 for HG and 4.0 for PG (S7F §13.4.6). A large positive margin means the pilot arrived too high. A margin near zero means they flew the final glide with little height to spare.

ESS altitude margin over final glide: top-10 median -284 m (n=9).